Foxes and hedgehogs on justification through law: a dialogue
- Fecha de recepción oficial de la propuesta: 2022-11-19
- Fecha decisión editorial: 2023-08-09
- Tipo de revisión por pares: Doble - ciego
La editorial declara haber utilizado algún sistema de búsqueda de plagio.
Autor: Gabriel Alejandro Encinas Duarte
The main claim of this book is that a shift can be traced in the way that our increasingly complex, plural societies are conceptualized. Influential thinkers such as Weber, Berlin and Rawls can be characterized as disavowing an objective standpoint from which to balance and harmonize the tensions and conflicts of values in modern societies. Paradoxically, in an interdependent world, an objective standpoint is more crucial than ever. Our societies require legal justifications which are both pluralist and cohesive. The way forward is not only discourse ethics as developed by Habermas, but also the theories of balancing and principles, following Alexy, as a general theory of justification, and as terms of exchange to mitigate the consequences of disagreement.
La principal afirmación de este libro es que se puede rastrear un cambio en la forma en que se conceptualizan nuestras sociedades cada vez más complejas y plurales. Pensadores influyentes como Weber, Berlín y Rawls rechazan un punto de vista objetivo desde el cual equilibrar y armonizar las tensiones y conflictos de valores en las sociedades modernas. Paradójicamente, en un mundo interdependiente, un punto de vista objetivo es más crucial que nunca. Nuestras sociedades requieren justificaciones jurídicas que sean a la vez pluralistas y cohesivas. El camino a seguir no es sólo la ética del discurso desarrollada por Habermas, sino también las teorías del equilibrio y los principios, siguiendo a Alexy, como teoría general de la justificación y como términos de intercambio para mitigar las consecuencias del desacuerdo.
Palabras Clave:
FilosofíaFilosofía social y políticaDerechos humanosPluralismo políticoCooperación internacionalMulticulturalismoCategorías:
- PHI000000. FILOSOFÍA > General
- QDTS. Filosofía social y política
- 196. Filosofía y psicología > Filosofía occidental moderna > España y Portugal
- Filosofía
CONTENT
Introduction
Research questions, methodology and relation to the state of the art
Research questions
Methodological considerations
Relation to the state of the art
Structure of the argument
On pluralist arguments
Pluralist arguments in theoretical reason: a minimalist conceptualization
Ontological pluralism
Epistemic pluralism
Alethic and logical pluralism
A plea for parallels among pluralist arguments in theoretical reason
Pluralist arguments in practical reason: a starting point
Value pluralism
The claim of plurality
The claim of incommensurability
The claim of tragic conflict or tragic loss
Political pluralism
The claim of plurality
The claim of incommensurability
The claim of tragic conflict or tragic loss
Legal pluralism
The claim of plurality
The claim of incommensurability
The claim of potential for tragic conflict or tragic loss
Preliminary outcome on pluralist arguments in practical reason
Section balance
Pluralist arguments and non-cognitivism
Max Weber
Romanism: from reason to rationality
Method
Typologies of rationality
Rationalization in politics, economy, and law
Spheres of life: across theoretical and practical pluralism
Weber on value.
Eigengesetzlichkeit: a forebear to functional differentiation?
Preliminary outcome
Isaiah Berlin
Berlin on negative liberty
Berlin’s value pluralism
Pluralist arguments in metaethics and metaphysics
Realism and cognitivism
The relation of liberalism and pluralism
John Rawls
Contextual remarks
The political turn around pluralist axes
Political liberalism, multiculturalism, and religious pluralism
Political liberalism and perfectionism
The law of peoples and human rights: political and/or metaphysical?
Preliminary outcome
Section outcome
Pluralist arguments and cognitivism
Habermas I: value pluralism in discourse ethics
Introduction and periodization
Earlier works and public sphere
Discourse ethics and communicative action
Preliminary balance
Alexy’s reception and critique of Habermas on law
The theory of rational discourse in legal justification
Reception of Habermas
Contribution to Habermasian discourse theory
The critique of Habermas in Alexy’s
Special case thesis
Principles theory
Balancing and proportionality: contexts of genesis
The structure of proportionality
Balancing and proportionality: contexts of justification
Objections to balancing
Alternatives to proportionality balancing
Rejoinder on the relation of balancing and application discourses
Preliminary balsance
Habermas II: value pluralism in discourse theory
Between facts and norms (bfn): co-originalities, law as medium, and democratic theory
Critique of balancing in Between facts and norms
A stringent separation of values and norms
Rights-minimalism?
Preliminary outcome: the necessity of balancing
Theories of legal principles as theories of pluralist values
Conclusions
Bibliography
- ID: SIMEHPRINTJJG26J8JG4JAC7449EAC
- Año de Publicación: 2025
- Presentación: Libro de tacto blando (Libro)
- Tamaño: 21 x 13.5 x 2 cm
- Número de páginas del contenido principal: 312 Páginas
- ISBN13: 9786076079911
- Peso: 0.268 kg
- PVP: MXN 405.00